I just bought myself a new camera. Necessary? not really. Love it? ABSOLUTELY!
Here's the scoop... my brother needed a new digital camera and asked my opinion on one he was considering buying. I gave him the thumbs up. He bought it online 2 days ago and had it shipped to our office. He received it today! (Pretty darn quick...) So, I got to scope it out for myself...testing things out a bit. This camera is fantastic! I fell in love with it, myself...
Let me introduce you to the Canon Power Shot SD1000 Digital ELPH. It's a beautiful thing... this is a 7.1 MP camera, and was on sale through Dell for $150. GREAT deal.
My last camera was a Canon; actually this very same camera...but a few models ago, which was bought about 4 years ago. I think it was a 4 or 5 mp camera. good for the time, but quickly became obsolete. I used it ALL the time (carried it in my purse), and it finally just stopped working for some reason. Don't know if I burnt out an internal motor or what the exact situation was, but rather than just have it looked at, I went out and bought a new and different camera instead...and I don't like it very much.
The camera I am currently carrying is a 10.1 MP Olympus Stylus 1000. It has all the "bells and whistles" which is what drew me to it in the first place. more MP, more shooting modes... i thought "more" meant "better." WRONG. A few things I don't like about the Olympus: i'ts complicated to use. I've been a camera fiend for YEARS, so the menus are nothing new. But this one is aggravating. This camera operates on the fact that you don't KNOW what you need...everything is an automatic mode, and you just have to tell it what type of picture you would like to take in order for the camera to "adjust itself" accordingly. This can be aggravating when you are not a simpleton and are trying to correct the "technical" stuff yourself. There is NO manual mode on the Olympus, which means that you have to tweak the automatic modes in order to fit your need. And when you DO choose to use one of the many automatic modes it offers, you have to "okay" it EVERY time you turn on the camera...so instead of being ready to shoot in 3 seconds, it can take 5, 6, or even up to 10 or 15 if you forget to hit the OK button first. Doesn't sound like a long time, but when you are dealing with pictures of children, it can mean the difference between a picture of their beautiful face or a blur of "something" going by. There are other complaints, too. but I want to get back to the good stuff...
So, I wanted a new camera. And I have been drooling over a digital SLR camera (the Canon XTi). But at $600, there is just NO way I will be getting that for myself anytime soon...especially with a wedding, honeymoon, moving, etc. that needs a chunk of that change.
But, due to the above-mentioned important events, I also don't want to get stuck with crappy pictures from my current crappy camera (Olympus). I am a photo-freak and take photos on (almost) a daily basis... it's important to me that the photos are good. So...after playing with my brother's camera extensively today, I really really wanted it.
This Canon seemed to be everything I had loved about my old one, but with all the old "problems" fixed. For instance, on my old Canon, I didn't like the lag time for the camera to be READY to take a photo once you turned it ON. This new one is ready in less than 3 seconds. On the old one, I got the motion blur quite a bit...I wanted something to remedy that. This new one DOESN'T have the "image stability" button that some other cameras do, but they try to accomodate it in their own way by speeding up the ISO (shutter speed), and have a "child and animal" (read: fast-moving objects) mode, as well as an "indoor" mode for the same reason. And, according to some of the reviews I checked out online, people couldn't tell the difference between Canon's remedy and other "image stability" uses. To be honest, that was one of the features I really wanted when looking for a new camera last time...I found it in the Olympus and thought my problems were solved. Nope. I didn't notice that big of a difference, actually.
This new Canon HAS MANUAL MODE!!! (I can hear the hallelujah chorus already...) Seriously, I used to use this ALL the time in my old camera, but it's not even available on my Olympus (boooo...). And this new Canon has a really cool picture viewing orientation-thing that it does...hard to explain, though (but I'll try). If you hold the camera in the normal way and take a picture, then turn the camera vertically to take a picture, the photos would normally be stored where some are horizontal and some are vertical, right? nope. Not only does this camera orient them the right way when they are imported to your computer (the Olympus did NOT do this and it drove me NUTS having to FIX each photo before storing), but on this Canon, if you turn the camera in "photo-viewing mode", the photo will orient itself correctly on the screen so you are able to view it larger. Totally cool...trust me.
Another good thing about this Canon...when you are focusing on faces, it has a face tracking mode, where it automatically "knows" to focus there instead of the random picture on the wall behind your subject. This is a wonderful invention.
Since I had my Olympus with me today, I took pictures of the same subject with both the Olympus and the Canon, to compare the actual quality of the images of the 2. WOW. what a difference... even though the Olympus has more megapixels, the Canon was MUCH more clear of an image. very crisp and bright. And I know that this is influenced by the size you shoot the image at, as well as the white balance, etc. But I am telling you, the Canon is a clear winner here.
So, while this was not really a NECESSARY purchase for me to make (and I went back and forth a lot on this decision because of this...), I decided to go ahead and buy it! woo-hoo!!!